Showing posts with label fandom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fandom. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Beyond Spock/Kirk

My initial plan for this week’s blog entry was to focus on the question of whether science fiction reading and writing is still something of a “boy’s club”. After reading the second portion of Constance Penley’s NASA/Trek, however, I’ve decided to reroute myself in order to contrast Penley’s experience with “fanfiction” with my own. The topics are certainly related—after all, fanfiction writing seems to create an almost exclusively female niche within “fandoms”.

In addition to being primarily female, the modern world of fanfiction is also primarily dedicated to works of fantasy and science fiction. I went to fanfiction.net, the largest online database of fanfiction, to collect some statistics. The most popular “fandoms” are as follows (the number of fics currently uploaded are in parentheses):


Books

1. Harry Potter (507, 944)

2. Twilight (178, 188)

3. Lord of the Rings (44, 628)


Movies

1. Star Wars (26, 080)

2. Pirates of the Caribbean (18, 4345)


TV Shows

1. Supernatural (46, 725)

2. Buffy: The Vampire Slayer (41, 561)


Although fanfiction as we think of it today arguably traces its roots back to Star Trek fanzines, I believe Penley’s description of fandom to be exceedingly limited—or at least outdated. (Of course, mine is necessarily limited as well, though in a different way; I’m not trying to invalidate hers so much as offer an alternative perspective). Nowadays, the fanfiction community is chiefly virtual, almost wholly anonymous, and much larger and broader in scope. Because of this, it is much less united. With the rise of fanfiction websites and online journals over “fanzines”, overall quality drops but participation skyrockets. This has allowed many younger writers to get involved: In my experience, most writers are women in their late teens or early twenties, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if girls in their mid to late teens actually outnumber older writers, even if the typically poor quality of these early works keeps them from achieving any recognition.

Penley describes the fanfiction writers she encounters as “an underground group… who have ingeniously subverted and rewritten Star Trek to make it answerable to their own sexual and social desires” (2-3). I would argue, however, that while some fans do seek to “subvert and rewrite”, this is only one of the motivations behind fanfiction writing. Another is to enhance. Fanfiction allows fans to expand upon the material offered on screen or in published print. For example, I remember years ago enjoying some of the very popular “Marauder-era” fanfiction set in the Harry Potter fandom years before the actual series began. Nothing in the stories I’m remembering contradicted the published work; rather they enriched it, adding detail to a time period only alluded to in the books. Similarly, another subgroup of fanfics extends beyond the original work, continuing the lives of beloved characters long after the last chapter has ended or the screen has gone dark. Fanfiction can also be used, particularly for movies and TV shows, to get inside characters’ heads in ways that visual media does not often allow.

Although Penley focuses heavily on the “slash” aspect, in my experience homosexual subtext is just one theme that a subgroup of fanfiction writers like to explore. Rather, I would argue that fanfiction as a whole is characterized by an emphasis on the emotional (and, yes, often romantic). Although this can manifest itself as a “slash” relationship (perhaps in the absence of female characters or relationships that meet the author’s approval) this hardly forms a majority. (I also wouldn’t be as quick as Penley to glorify explicit “slash” works as some sort of revolution—sometimes porn or erotica is just porn or erotica. I don’t think anyone would be feeling too congratulatory over a man drawing or writing a highly sexual scene between two women.)

A third purpose of fanfiction is what Tom Moylan calls “inside” or “popular” criticism (36-37). Although presented in the form of a narrative, some fanfiction is clearly written as a way for the author to express his or her evaluation or interpretation of a controversial aspect of the original work, such as an episode of a TV show that seems to break character continuity.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, is the community that fanfiction writing offers, which Penley briefly describes. Although the fanfiction community as a whole has expanded far past the point of unity, authors still tend to clump together (usually by original source material or, in the case of large fandoms, by the character or pairings they most enjoy). In my experience, these authors not only encourage each other’s writing, but often go out of their way to offer real-world support as well.


"This is honestly about fandom in general - everyone’s a fan of something - and it’s a tribute to it. The point about LINDA is that they forget the Doctor after a while, and make friends. They’re genuinely good mates. That’s what good fandom does. It’s real passion, and connection, and fun. And that’s not said often enough." - Doctor Who showrunner Russel T Davies concerning the episode in which the Doctor gets a fan club ("LINDA")

Get a Life!: Taking Fiction as Reality

What makes or breaks a television show, a movie, or a book series in the often maligned and marginalized science fiction genre? The fans. Fans brought Star Trek back from a future of being remembered as nothing more than a short-run campy scifi show to a burgeoning enterprise. Fans brought Star Wars from the silver screen into an expanded universe of novels, comics, video games, television shows, merchandising and established the brand as a multimedia empire. Fans are an integral part of keeping any creative venture afloat, but more so in the science fiction genre than anywhere else. Without there would be no Next Generation and the reality of science would pale in comparison to the fiction.

Fans bring a number of things with them. The first being a passionate intensity for one subject: Star Wars, Star Trek, Star Gate, Serenity, Doctor Who, and a host of others that I cannot think of at the moment. Fans gather in conventions to put their interest on public display. Some even fashion costumes to mimic many characters from the universe. There is a place for all kinds of fan obsession: from the lowliest Stormtrooper to the emperor of the Galactic Empire all fans play their role.

They are Legion.
The second thing that fans bring as an intimate familiarity with the source material. The best contribution to a body of work such as Star Wars may come through the writing of passionate fans as seen in the Expanded Universe. This interest may spread to areas unforeseen by the series creator, as theories of fan canonity or "fanon" may outshine the original established canon and replace it. For insance, Boba Fett's death in the Sarlacc Pit was ruled out after several highly successful stories in the Expanded Universe were published and his position as an Ensemble Darkhorse among the fans was firmly entrenched. In one of his many rereleases of the trilogy, "George Lucas stated in the audio commentary of Return of the Jedi that he added a shot of Boba Fett crawling out of the Sarlacc, which Fett does, stating that the character survived, he managed to blast himself out, killing the Sarlacc in the process" [http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Boba_Fett]. The fans played a role in Lucas reaching this decision, so the "fanon" became canon.

The moral of the story is popularity will bring you back from being slowly digested for 10,000 years.
--Get a Life sketch from SNL




It is precisely because the fans may take it too far, that they may let the fiction affect the reality that we are able to see precisely how much our reality is itself a construct of the fiction. In Constance Penley's "NASA/TREK" the ideology of the construct Star Trek is the driving force behind the reality of NASA, and they rarely meet up cleanly. In other words, our drive to reach the stars is driven by a fiction, and the practice may not necessarily live up to it. No more clearly is this connection between the fiction and the reality present than in examples of fiction taking on fiction-- pastiches such as Galaxy Quest.

Jason Nesmith: There is no "quantum flux". There's no "auxiliary". THERE'S NO GODDAMNED SHIP. You got it?
...
Brandon Wheeger: I just wanted to tell you that I thought a lot about what you said. 
Jason Nesmith: It's okay, now listen... 
Brandon Wheeger: But I want you to know that I'm not a complete brain case, okay? I understand completely that it's just a TV show. I know there's no beryllium sphere... 
Jason Nesmith: Hold it. 
Brandon Wheeger: no digital conveyor, no ship... 
Jason Nesmith: Stop for a second, stop. It's all real. 
Brandon Wheeger: Oh my God, I knew it. I knew it! I knew it! 
--Galaxy Quest

In some cases the difference between canon and "fanon" become blurred and the former may affect the former. Similarly "fanfiction" and a successful pastiche are not too far off from each other as well.  In the case of the film Galaxy Quest, the characters are clear send-ups to the characters from the various iterations of Star Trek. Tim Allen's character Jason Nesmith channels a Shatnerian delivery that reeks of overacting and arrogance accompanying the public perception of William Shatner milking his role in the original series for all its worth. Alan Rickman's alien character carries clear influences from both Spock and Worf– the inability to remove himself from the I Am Not Spock problem of never escaping your role as the other, the makeup and prosthetics, and the chilly exterior.

Although it might be made by fans we shouldn't confuse parody for fanfiction.


Galaxy Quest works as an interesting instance of pastiche because it in fact lauds the role of the fans– the heroes could not succeed without the aid of several nerdy characters Tim Allen had written off at the start of the story. The fans save the world, the actors only succeed by luck and the virtue of others. When Nesmith writes off the fan Brandon as embracing a short-lived series with little merit he does a disservice to the concept of works like Star Trek. Sure, their sets may be cheesy, their acting not always on mark, and their plots contrived. But a work like Star Trek which takes the future of man (and woman's) exploration into the farthest reaches of the cosmos as its subject allows for a greater access to the potentiality of a bright future in the public unconscious. That allows for strides forward in the field of science.


Sagan neglects to account for something when he says,"Entertainment...is the opposite of enlightenment; popular science and science cannot coexist because popular science ("irrationality") confounds the progress of science ("rationality")." (Penley 6) The popular fiction allows for insight into where science might take us, even if the specifics of the science are hazy or downright wrong. The popular science influences the science in a way that makes it meaningful, even if the actual science behind it is bunk.


Sources:

Yaoi/Slash

1 comments
ETA: Just saw Arlyn's post, and she goes deeper into Brody's argument about queer readings rewriting the text.

Riffing off the last paragraph of Rhiannon's post, as well as an off-the-cuff promise I made during Sunday's field trip, I'm going to write about slash. :D Except I'll be expanding the topic a bit to incorporate yaoi fandom as well, despite the obvious differences in cultural context. This post will be a bit quote heavy, as I'm mostly interested in throwing out some thoughts rather than making a totalizing statement about slash/yaoi. (See what I did there?) My approach is almost diametrically opposed to Moylan's, as I found myself agreeing with Michael's assessment of the flaws in Absent Paradigms. Instead of looking at critical texts, I sought out the views of fans and writers--what they wanted to say in a text and what they wanted to read out of a text.

First of all, I dove into the depths of fanfiction.net, just for you guys. Well, not the depths, but I wanted to survey the available options for reading slash fic. I didn't check that every fic was explicitly slash, I just used the Char A/Char B search, but here are some numbers. These numbers refer to the 3027 fics available under the "Star Trek: Original Series" header. I also refer to the ratings of fics, where T refers to age 13+, and M to age 16+. Explicit, adult-rated fics are not allowed on fanfiction.net (so they say).

Out of 834 fics featuring Kirk/Spock, 271 are rated T, and 114 are rated M. Out of 389 Spock/McCoy fics, 121 are rated T, and 52 are rated M. Out of 130 Kirk/McCoy fics, 32 are rated T, and 9 are rated M. The other pairings I looked at had few enough fics that I separated out the explicitly slash and rated-M pairings from other pairings. Of these, there were 2 Scotty/McCoy, 1 Spock/Chekov, 1 Kirk/Scotty, and 3 Kirk/Chekov. I did not look at sites aimed at fandoms, which would likely have more stories. In terms of a cursory look at the general availability of slash pairings, I think this is fine, with the caveat about the whole character search thing not necessarily yielding explicit slash fics.

From here, I move into Yaoi fandom and writership. Yaoi, in contrast to Bara, tends to be aimed at and written by women. Rhiannon's post interrogates this kind of phenomenon happening in the world of fanfic, with the conclusion that perhaps a lack of accessible and well-written female characters leads readers to have more interest in the romances between the well-developed male characters.

In her piece on Cleopatra Jones, Brody makes an interesting point regarding queer readings that I think applies very well to the whole slash/yaoi concept. She asserts that "borrowing and recontextualizing images from the past is part of the pleasure of queer reading" (101), but that queer readings do not necessarily accompany a greater visibility of queerness in the works to be read or their readership. Slash offers a possibility of inserting queer readings into and pulling them out of texts with little explicit mention of queerness as identity. Said more simplistically, slash lets readers pull scenes from a work (text or film or even game--there are a few) that do not necessarily signify a certain kind of relationship, but allows the reader-writers to construct a narrative around these scenes in which these relationships are made blatant.

It's interesting how yaoi functions along similar lines, as the overwhelming majority of works involving yaoi are doujinshi, or fan-made works that are essentially fanfic but for manga and anime. Additionally, a fair amount of published yaoi mangaka started by writing their own fanfics or djs. During a panel on yaoi and yuri manga and an LGBTQ audience, Erika Friedman writes,
Fan-fiction is the breeding ground. I wrote what I wanted to read. If you're doing any kind of fan work, fanart, fan-fiction or cosplay — you're queering that you've done. You fantasized it and did something different with it. That's human nature. I don't think it has anything to do with yaoi or yuri.

This quote aligns with Brody's use of "queer" as a verb, as something done to a text and not something that is represented within the text. Also, it's interesting to see Friedman associate fan-made work with "queering", especially when such a significant portion of fan-made work is explicitly queered.

In an earlier moment from the same panel, Leyla Aker discusses yaoi's huge female fanbase, something that seems paradoxical about works depicting sexual relationships between gay or bisexual men. (Note: this paradox also applies to slash fic.) She resolves this paradox by once again raising the banner of queerness,
To go back to what Chris said about (yaoi) being fundamentally queer, I think one of the reasons why yaoi appeals to people is its dislocation. You're talking about stories women for women about the opposite gender relationships.

Here, the queering that goes on within the work enables the reader to enact and question their own queerness. But I think this explanation, while intriguing, fails to address the often exploitative relationship of yaoi manga and slash fic to actual queerness. Just as Brody points out, the consumption of yaoi manga and slash fic permits an erasure of LGBTQ identities that do not conform to the stylized images in the works.

One gay activist in Japan wrote against yaoi manga(ka) in 1992, quoted from a discussion on the debates surrounding yaoi here,
He felt that his human rights as a gay man were harmed by women drawing and enjoying yaoi manga. He compared them to the 'dirty old men' [hentai jijii] who watch pornography including women engaging in sexual activities with each other. In addition, he accused yaoi of creating and having a skewed image of gay men as beautiful and handsome and regarding gay men who do not fit that image and tend to 'hide in the dark' as 'garbage' [gomi]. In addition, he attacked them for creating the 'gay boom', a media wave of interest in gay issues sparked by women's magazine Crea, which, according to him, did nothing for gay men at large.

To what extent does the (often-)female readership of yaoi and slash-fic render GBTQ men abstracted but invisible? Doesn't casting the situation like this erase the experiences of GBTQ men who read yaoi manga and slash-fic? And isn't there something fundamentally anti-feminist about the fact that this huge industry that caters to female sexuality has no women in it, except as one-dimensional villains? (I remember a post I came across quite some time ago discussing the issue of female sexuality coming out in male-male(-male?) relationships, but I couldn't find it for today.)

And if anyone wants my recommendations for yaoi manga, check out Future Lovers, which also comes recommended from the panel that produced the first two blockquotes. It avoids the common pitfalls of "evil women", "rapey seme", and actually represents a loving relationship that navigates surrounding pressures from the family and the workplace. Though there is a bit of explicit sex...